As some of you may remember, OSNA was brought back to life over a decade ago as way to reach neighbors to promote the expansion of the Historic District to it's present size. At that time I had sent out written information, as well as set up informational sessions with guest speakers from the HDC to explain rules and regulations in more detail. I was overwhelmed by the interest in preservation, and encouraged by some "old timers" to resurrect the once active and vibrant OSNA.
When that expansion took place, our efforts had established a regulatory power to prevent the insidious deterioration of the Historic character and wholeness of our neighborhood. Yes, it is true that we started protecting our "jewel" of a neighborhood late in life, after much damage had been done, but the historic fabric and character that this neighborhood maintains, to this day, outshines many a lower Fairfield County, or Eastern CT shoreline neighborhood.
To this end, I would have remained steadfast in the refusal to allow construction in ANY capacity (new, old, remodel) to set a precedent that could jeopardize any of our over 100 historically protected buildings - of which ALL are applicable - not just the "old" ones Remember, it is not only the structures individually that a HDC commits to protect, but the character of the neighborhood as a whole.
How many years is it reasonable to think that the HDC can remain unchallenged legally now from approving application for vinyl siding? How many years for new construction? How many years for any construction? And how much will those challenges (if the HDC does not capitulate) cost the taxpayers?
I believe that the guidelines from the Secretary of the Interior regarding the appropriateness of siding types are very clear in this case. And when appointed, our Historic District Commissioners take on the duty and obligation to maintain those standards. Please note carefully - we live in a federally designated and recognized district. This is not about house hugging or zealotry. Vinyl siding may indeed by an industry standard in New England, but NOT in a historic district.
I fear this was a definitive step backwards in the message we send to our town leaders, our residents and frankly, local developers about our level of the unwavering commitment we have for our Historic District.
-- Ann Lindsay Jackson
No comments:
Post a Comment